
Stag films at their most innocent
“Adult movies are often treated like a dirty little secret. But what took place in that crowded room late on a Saturday afternoon at the Boston Park Plaza Hotel was an open dialogue about the promise and the peril of dealing with such material. The room was charged with a sense of both relief and excitement: relief that, finally, some of the dirty little secrets about moving image archives were coming out of cold storage; excitement about the scholarly and philosophical questions that surround these materials being voiced.” -Eric Schaefer “Dirty Little Secrets”
Working with a collection that hardly ever sees the light of day can be more than just fascinating some times; it can be down right enthralling. Sometime ago I stumbled upon a film as I was cleaning in the stacks. I have to admit the title caught me off guard; “Old Porn” said the label as I mentally tried to push my prudishness to the back of my mind. For the life of me I could not figure out what an old porn flick could be doing at my place of employment. Sure we had films on venereal diseases and drug addiction, but porn somehow didn’t seem to fit. A search on our database provided this description:
“Loosely following the theme of auditioning for a stage production, includes dancing, the “casting couch,” and sex in different positions and locations. An anthology of porn from the ’30’s and ’40’s”
I inquired a little further asking those I could surmise had seen it what it contained. The answer was it was tame, nothing compared to what’s out now. It was sometime after this that I forgot about it a put the idea of watching it to the back of my mind.
Thoughts have this strange way of creeping back into your brain and so it was with “Old Porn”. Just a few days ago my mind wandered back to it curious as to what the celluloid could possibly contain, I made a mental note to watch it come Monday…
I gingerly threaded the film through our ancient moviola hoping it wasn’t too damaged to be seen. Since I had been discussing the film with another student I invited her as well thinking nothing of what we were about to pay witness to. I’m not sure who began the myth that everything was far more innocent in the past, after all where did we all learn our bad habits?
Tame would have been the best word to describe the first five minutes of the film, which featured women dancing and posing naked. And then suddenly the films tone changed and we found ourselves looking at something far more “risqué” than either of us had anticipated. Clip after clip showed varied sexual acts both heterosexual and homosexual in nature sparing none of the detail allowing the viewer to see anything an everything.
The prude in me immediately arrived on the scene, as I covered my eyes in disgust. Who could possibly think this was art? Better yet who could actually sit and enjoy this? I had to calm down and collect my thought, try to open my brain back up to the idea that this was film, no matter what the content.
A few hours later I sat thinking about what I’d seen. Sure it was not well shot, these directors were no John Ford or Griffith. The people in the films moved awkwardly as if they weren’t exactly comfortable with what they were doing. However, this aside there were some fascinating things about this film, things I couldn’t discredit. For example the film was not one continuous narrative. Rather the reel was composed of bits and pieces of different stag films, each spliced together. It appeared to me to be the handiwork of the original owner, someone with various bits of film he or she wished to make into one reel. How our outfit got a hold of it I will never know, there are hardly any records of acquisitions that I have come across in my two years of employment. Each piece bore a different edge code with many dating back to the 1930s. Above all of this I realized that these films were not made as pieces of art, rather they were made for consumption and entertainment at a time when film was still relatively new. Some of the fragments bore title cards which tells me that perhaps many of these early stags were shot as silent films rather than sound ones.
“Old Porn” stands as a piece of history, one that many people have tried to forget. Like anything visual this film records snippets of times and places that may no longer exist. Much like the quote above describes, these types of films are something that many archives or repositories have in common. They often receive the smallest amount of attention because of their content and may be the first to get junked. However, I think it is the nature of these films that should be championed. They are offbeat and irregular, a glimpse into a world most people know little about; a document of history and of our truely carnal nature.







